Jump to Navigation
Former prosecutor Daniel Perlman works directly with each client through every stage of every case. He combines trial skills, negotiation skills and a detailed familiarity with the community treatment and counseling programs that might stand between you and a criminal conviction.

Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Blog

Could some very young juvenile offenders suffer from psychopathy?

Can young children legitimately be diagnosed as psychopaths? Should they be? These interesting questions were raised by a recent New York Times Magazine article discussing the controversy in the world of psychology about whether so-called "callous-unemotional" children may actually be displaying the behaviors diagnosed in adults as "antisocial personality disorder" -- the disorder many people call sociopathy or psychopathy.

Adult psychopaths, according to the article, make up less than 1 percent of the population, but could make up as many as 15 to 25 percent of the prison population and are thought to be responsible for more violent crimes. Juvenile offenders can and do commit crimes of violence, but it is considered by many to be both cruel and premature to diagnose them with the disorder.

Lawyer: State hid evidence in Irwindale councilman embezzlement case

Over the last eight months, three current or former members of the Irwindale city council, along with its former finance director, have been indicted by grand juries on suspicion of white collar crimes involving allegedly improper use of city funds for travel expenses. Among other charges, the four were indicted for embezzlement -- and the criminal defense attorney for Councilman Manuel Garcia says that prosecutors illegally obtained that indictment by withholding key evidence that proves his innocence.

"Mr. Garcia is completely innocent of this charge," the attorney told reporters on Friday. "All he has done over the years is serve his community in a very honest and forthright manner."

Do invasive TSA searches violate your constitutional rights?

We have all read stories about problems at the Transportation Security Administration -- problems ranging from the humiliating mistreatment of innocent passengers to accusations of racial profiling and religious discrimination. It's frustrating, but we have been compelled to accept these "lapses" in the interest of stopping terrorists. When some complain that the government's use of full-body scanners and intimate pat-downs violate the constitutional protections of U.S. citizens, their complaints are generally shut down by the desire for "security."

When Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky was kept from his flight in January because he refused a TSA pat down, however, the political stakes abruptly rose. In fact, he announced his intention to thoroughly overhaul the TSA -- or eliminate the agency altogether.

What does the Daniel Chong incident say about defendants' rights?

University of California-San Diego Daniel Chong has not been charged with any crime. He was arrested during an April 21 drug raid by the federal Drug Enforcement Agency on a party in San Diego, where federal agents claim to have found marijuana, Ecstasy, hallucinogenic mushrooms and prescription drugs, along with three guns and some ammunition. Chong was rounded up with eight others and taken to a holding cell in a San Diego County jail.

He was left there for five days without human contact, food or water. By the third day, he was hallucinating and was forced to drink his own urine to survive. He screamed for help the whole time, sometimes hearing agents outside his cell, but no one helped him. Once jail employees "found" him, he was near death and had to spend three days in intensive care.

No one -- not the most hardened criminal -- deserves to be treated this way. Beyond the basics of what we consider a criminal defendant's rights in the criminal justice system, whenever any law enforcement agency takes someone into custody, that agency takes on legal responsibility to ensure the health and welfare of that person.

So was the cruel, nearly fatal negligence practiced against Chong by the DEA an isolated incident, or evidence of a systemic problem?

Historic 1992 Watts gang truce worked, spread for 10 years

As we remember the 20th anniversary of the L.A. Riots, it is interesting how we have forgotten another important event that took place that same week. In Watts, on April 28, 1992 -- the day before the riots began -- black street gangs including the Crips and Bloods, declared a truce.

"I do drive-by shootings, I kidnap babies, I kill people, so what? I'm an active gang member," said one participant in a ceasefire rally outside the Nickerson Gardens housing project. "I'm going to stop."

When a skeptical reporter asked if the truce would actually result in a reduction in gang-related crimes in the area, the man responded, "Check the homicide rate in Watts next year this time, fool."

May Day protests spark massive arrests

May Day protests spark massive arrests state-wide, but in Los Angeles and the surrounding communities, much of the organized demonstrations went off peacefully.  A number of protestors were taken into custody for civil disobedience intentionally near LAX this afternoon, but near downtown at least one protested was arrested for striking a LAPD officer with a a skateboard. 

The purpose of the protesting is to gain awareness and support for a number of causes that protestors feel are being ignored by politicians and are little known or understood by the general public.

While no serious disturbances took place, the city of Los Angeles and local law enforcement were prepared for major uprisings, citing an awareness for the massive riots that took place 20 years ago today.  One of the protest marches that was staged today, began it's path at Florence and Normandy, a flashpoint for the 1992 riots.

During demonstrations like today's as well as the occupy movements, both fringe attendees who are not in line with the peaceful intentions of the demonstrations as well as peaceful demonstrators often get caught up in violence like assaulting a police officer or resisting arrest, and these types of conflicts are often sparked by destruction of public or private property (vandalism), or graffiti.

You have a right to peaceful demonstration and assembly, but there are limits on what has been determined to be a reasonable interpretation of the constitution.  Stretching that interpretation will often result in arrests.  A classic example of this, that is often mis-cited by overly eager demonstrators is the idea that the freedom of speech will protect your right to cry "fire" in a crowded theatre.  This is not the case of course and the resulting stampede may cost life and limb which you would and should be held responsible for.  on the other side of the spectrum however, freedom of speech must be enforced and those exercing that right today in a peaceful way are to be commended.

Of course, those who found themselves caught up in a negative interaction with law enforcement, for example, resisting arrest, may need assistance in exercising their constitutional right to counsel.

Los Angeles man accused of stealing dirt and trees from parkland

The Los Angeles City Attorney's Office has charged an LA man with multiple criminal counts after an issue arose while he was building a dream house on his Mulholland Drive property. He is accused of having dirt and trees removed from nearby parkland and brought onto his property in order to grade the land for the foundation of the house.

In California, grading land near wild lands could negatively impact or destroy protected trees, which include California Live Oaks and Valley Oaks, California Black Walnut trees, Western Sycamores and California Bay trees. In this case, the threat to nearby live oaks and black walnuts led to criminal charges: two counts of destruction of property, two counts of illegal grading and one count of removing protected trees.

Disabled South Gate woman arrested for trespass at foreclosure protest

Ana C. has cerebral palsy, which largely confines her to a motorized cart. She's not asking for a handout. She and her husband apparently had no problem paying the mortgage on their South Gate house -- until she got breast cancer and her husband had to miss work to take care of her. Then, they missed a couple of payments. They sought a loan modification from Wells Fargo, but the bank refused. She is now facing eviction.

Ana is only one of thousands of people who believe their foreclosures are the result of injustice by banks, including Wells Fargo. In fact, on April 26 about 100 protesters picketed before the San Marino residence of Wells Fargo's CFO, all for the ostensible purpose of allowing Ana C. to make her payment in person. She knocked on the executive's door and demanded to speak with him. Now she has been arrested for a species of trespass -- violating a San Marino City Ordinance prohibiting residential picketing.

More trouble for Dykstra: New bankruptcy fraud charges

Former Major League Baseball player Lenny Dykstra has not had a good couple of years. He is currently serving a three-year prison sentence for three counts of grand theft auto. He was forced into bankruptcy in 2009, and was subsequently indicted on allegations of concealing property from the bankruptcy court and estate. Just earlier this month, Dykstra pled guilty to charges of assault and lewd conduct, which added 90 days in jail and three years of probation to his tab. Now Dykstra is facing a superseding indictment in the bankruptcy fraud case -- and he is facing up to 95 years in prison.

The new indictment, which was filed on April 17 in the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles. The charges include multiple counts of obstruction of justice, bankruptcy fraud and money laundering.

Fooling around on your work computer: A white collar crime?

Long before the Internet was publicly available -- long before the average person even owned a personal computer -- the U.S. Congress passed a law to address a then-novel form of criminal behavior: computer hacking. The 1984 law called the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act prohibits accessing computers without authorization or exceeding one's actual level of authorization to do so. If you do so, you could be charged with a federal white collar crime.

Over the decades, the law has been repeatedly expanded. Still, the Department of Justice has urged greater and expanded use of the statute as it sought to deal with more complex Internet crimes -- and has arguably begun charging people for behavior that would otherwise not be criminal -- and that most people would never suspect could be a federal offense.

Criminal Law Blog Personal and Resourceful Advocacy When You Need It
Do You Have a Case?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

  • Avvo Rating

Law Offices of Daniel R. Perlman
6464 Sunset Blvd.
Suite 1030
Los Angeles, CA 90028
Phone: (213) 985-0670
Toll Free: (877) 814-7586
Map & Directions